Sources & fine print

Everything traces to a source; this page has the fine print. Sources are grouped by reliability: primary and legal first, then journalism, data and models, academic work, historical context. Where a link wouldn't verify, I say so.

Bias disclosure

I'm Argentinian, Messi my GOAT, and I want the trophy on July 19. Biased, obviously. 🇦🇷 But I steelmanned the doubters and kept the numbers honest.

Read this first

Hold these in mind:

  • All probabilities are speculative estimates, not facts.
  • The FBI probe is reported, not confirmed. No charges filed; the AFA denies wrongdoing.
  • Controversy ≠ corruption. Every incident has a rule-based explanation on record.
  • Complaints from the losing side are motivated. That doesn't make them wrong.
  • Facts move fast: the semifinals (July 14–15) may change everything.
  • Strongest reason to keep match-fixing low: no World Cup finals match has ever been proven fixed.

The three biggest open questions

Three things to watch:

  • Does the DOJ move from preliminary inquiry to an indictment or cooperating witness? Watch after July 19.
  • Does any hard artifact (leaked comms, a whistleblower, an assignment-anomaly study) link appointments or VAR to outcomes?
  • Does the officiating pattern regress under maximum final scrutiny?

The third model

Nate Silver's 'PELE' model (Elo/SPI-style, 100,000 daily sims) is paywalled, so its per-team numbers aren't here; the comparison rests on Opta and the market.

The sources

Tier 1 — Primary / legal / official

Tier 2 — Quality journalism

Tier 3 — Data & models

Tier 4 — Academic

Tier 5 — Historical context

Dig deeper, and correct me

I'd rather be corrected than comfortable. Found an error, a dead link, a stronger source? Tell me on LinkedIn. Corrections get noted on the blog, with credit. LinkedIn.

Opinion and analysis, not journalism. Not affiliated with FIFA, the AFA, or any team. Named individuals appear only as reported by the linked sources; nothing here asserts guilt. Made with Claude.